<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How social media has shaped masculinity<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Over the past 20 years, social media has become a global phenomenon, one deeply ingrained in modern life with platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook having a combined total of 3.5 billion active users<\/a>. These platforms are instrumental in forming and sustaining friendships, facilitating advertising and networking, and raising public awareness. The algorithms on these apps promote content to users based on <\/a>engagement<\/a>; posts or videos with more likes, comments, or shares are more likely to be shown to users. However, the content of these posts and what they promote, though popular, can vary greatly, and some of it, as well as the connections it helps form, can be dangerous. Since the conception of the internet, and increasingly so since the advent of social media<\/a>, online spaces have become hotbeds for harmful ideologies, particularly those that target youth, and it is those that target young men which have become of particular concern. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This reality was starkly reflected in the Netflix show Adolescence,<\/em> which took the internet by storm in March of 2025. This series brought the issue of toxic masculinity, a socially destructive conception of masculinity more thoroughly defined later, into the media mainstream and blatantly displayed how it can affect young men, as well as its potentially fatal consequences. Adolescence<\/em>\u2019s bleak, albeit accurate representation of gendered aggression and social media\u2019s role in it deeply resonated with its wide audience. Unfortunately, Adolescence <\/em>and the message it sends isn\u2019t as fictional as one might hope. In the United Kingdom alone, where the show is set, one woman is killed every three days by a man<\/a>. In the United States, 22.7% of homicides<\/a> are committed by men against women, making this the second-largest gender-based homicide demographic. These are just a handful of demonstrations of the extreme outcomes of a pervasive and topical issue in today\u2019s media centric world. <\/p>\n\n\n\n While these statistics are a striking display of the possible outcomes of unchecked misogyny, they do not help to understand how or why such violence may occur. Many online social spaces and the beliefs they promote are intricately tied to the causes of these crimes. Internet communities such as the \u201cmanosphere<\/a>,\u201d an online phenomenon targeting men, encourage ideas such as misogyny, violence as a means to power, and dominance as hallmarks of a \u201cman.\u201d This online echo chamber of violent and misogynistic beliefs is what many young men are finding themselves immersed in today. This article will explore how social media is contributing to a concerning increase in toxic masculinity as well as dangerous gendered ideals among young men which is damaging to their mental health. It will discuss social media\u2019s contribution in the spread of these toxic beliefs, beginning with the evolution of toxic masculinity before delving into its effects on young men and concluding with potential solutions for this insidious and proliferating issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What is \u201ctoxic masculinity\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Toxic masculinity<\/a>, as referred to earlier, is an umbrella term that has been used to refer to the forms of masculinity that are socially harmful. Often it is used when issues such as misogyny and masculine violence are involved, which themselves are tied to\u00a0hegemonic masculinity<\/a>, a form of masculinity that values and promotes the social dominance of men through violence, aggression, and the subordination of women and other minority groups. These sociocultural practices are common and are encouraged in the \u201cmanosphere,\u201d which the\u00a0United Nations defines as<\/a>\u00a0a catchall phrase for the \u201conline communities that\u2026[promote] narrow and aggressive definitions of what it means to be a man \u2013 and the false narrative that feminism and gender equality have come at the cost of men\u2019s rights\u201d. Communities such as these exist on and because of the internet, with its ability to connect people with common beliefs and interests. With the rise of social media, these communities have only increased in size, number, and toxicity. However, in many cases, men may happen across these communities without knowing what they are. They may appear to be\u00a0centered<\/a>\u00a0around self-improvement, carefully drawing people in while promoting unhealthy behavior under the guise of self-help.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Men Going Their Own Way<\/a>\u00a0(MGTOW) is one such example of these communities. As innocuous as the name may sound, it belies the misogynistic, violent, and male-supremacist nature of this group. The members of this community, follow a severely anti-feminist precept, the\u00a0tenets<\/a>\u00a0of which include statements such as \u201c\u2026modern \u201cWestern\u201d society has been corrupted by feminism\u2026\u201d and that \u201c\u2026feminism ensures that men are either actively subjected to (or at serious risk of) discrimination\u201d. These are indubitably extreme beliefs, and one may wonder how exactly anyone could adopt these; however the answer is much simpler than it seems, \u201cIndividuals<\/a>\u00a0may adopt the MGTOW ideology for any number of reasons, but several common precursors include being rejected by women, being subjected to perceived discrimination or unrealistic male beauty standards and shifting cultural norms\u201d.\u00a0With nearly\u00a033,000<\/a>\u00a0members and counting, MGTOW is the epitome of the online toxic masculinity epidemic and displays exactly how men can become involved in these communities.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The \u201creal man\u201d ideal<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n While it may be clear how toxic masculinity is harmful for the sociologically defined minority groups which it targets, it may not be as clear how toxic masculinity hurts the men involved in it themselves. An article<\/a> published by the Journal of Clinical Psychology<\/em> details how hegemonic masculinity shapes men\u2019s self-image and through that their behaviors and conceptions of \u201cmanliness\u201d: <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201c…hegemonic masculinity\u2026includes a high degree of ruthless competition, an inability to express emotions other than anger, an unwillingness to admit weakness or dependency, devaluation of women and all feminine attributes in men, homophobia, and so forth\u2026Hegemonic masculinity is conceptual and stereotypic in the sense that most men\u2026tend to worry lest others will view them as unmanly for their deviations from the hegemonic ideal of the real man\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Essentially, by adopting a hegemonic viewpoint of masculinity, men both isolate themselves and surround themselves with these ideals. They equate their own value as a man to their alignment with these standards, and they devalue anyone, themselves included, who does not meet them. This includes, as stated, women as a whole and men whom they deem \u201cunmanly\u201d. It is these values that online spaces are espousing and that men, young men especially, are finding themselves involved in. Given that men may stumble upon these communities when trying to find ways to improve themselves, they may be more receptive to these beliefs, on the assumption that if they adopt these behaviors, they will be \u201cbetter men\u201d, a belief which is then supported by the communities themselves. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This can often have the opposite effect as both social media in general and these communities in particular have been shown to be hazardous for mental health. Social media use, compounded with messages encouraging toxic masculine standards has been associated<\/a> with increased risk of depression among men. This proves to be an even greater issue when considering the fact that hegemonic masculinity admonishes \u201cemotions other than anger\u201d, including vulnerability<\/a>, as well as \u201cweakness\u201d and \u201cdependency\u201d. Given this, it is likely that men will be even less motivated to address serious mental health issues at risk of appearing a \u201cweak man\u201d. This illustrates how social media, and hegemonic communities exacerbate the problems associated with toxic masculinity by creating an environment in which men internalize the idea of \u201cvulnerability as weakness\u201d; they jeopardize their mental health for the sake of being perceived as a \u201creal man\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n A toxic pipeline<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Studies<\/a> have shown that this is the exact rabbit hole young men fall into, a pipeline that begins with seeking guidance and assistance and ends in toxic online spaces that exploit this vulnerability and abuse it. Boys and young men may enter these spaces unaware of the ideologies they uphold, and are, as one such report<\/a> details, \u201calgorithmically offered hateful or misogynistic content, which in turn is being normalised by the high levels of their usage\u2026[Content]\u2026initially focused on loneliness and a search for belonging\u2026then pushed topics such [as] hyper or hegemonic masculinity\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The boys and young men who become entrapped in these cultures are often the victims of a social system that has failed them on multiple counts; from the social media algorithms that lead them into these spaces to the people involved in these spaces who take advantage of the anonymity the internet provides to project these harmful norms of masculinity upon the youth. These boys, who may be alone and isolated and turn to social media as a form of connection, are then met with the facade of it. They gain access to these communities only if they conform to the expectations within them. They adjust their worldviews and self-schemas just to be accepted and by doing so, become both the victims and the perpetrators of toxic masculinity. By only gaining acceptance when they take on the role of a \u201creal man,\u201d they come to believe that they will only be accepted so long as they are \u201creal men\u201d and meet the expectations of one as prescribed by hegemonic masculinity. As young men engage more regularly with toxic masculinity online, their conceptions of gender roles become shaped<\/a> by the media they consume. They come to view emotional vulnerability as weakness and report negative attitudes towards women. This failure of these young men leads them to believe that acceptance is conditional, that in order to obtain it they must assert dominance and maintain emotional stoicism. By exposing them to these ideals when they are vulnerable, they come to internalize them, regardless of the harm these ideals bring to themselves and others. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Why current solutions have not been successful<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The issue of toxic masculinity is much more multifaceted than it seems, far more than has been presented so far. Indeed, some programs intending to resolve this issue can in fact perpetuate the problem. An article<\/a> by the American Journal of Public Health<\/em> states, \u201cSome types of public\u2026messaging can reify [the] harmful aspects of hegemonic masculinity that [these] programs are working to change.\u201d This demonstrates how even, and especially, well-intentioned programs can inadvertently reinforce the very issues they aim to resolve, which helps explain why so many campaigns and programs addressing toxic masculinity have failed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n